Staff Court Reporters may be available, though it is not guaranteed, to report law and motion matters on the following schedule: Department 21-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. Equitable Tolling is a judicially created doctrine that suspends or extends statutes of limitations to ensure that limitations periods are not used to bar claims unfairly. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. If a Staff Reporter is not available, you may need to provide your own. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . Toggle navigation. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. While it is always possible the Court is or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court is unpersuaded by this. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. 5. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, CV-22-004844 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs TAHLA, MUHAMMAD Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. (There are also print/PDF versions in English and Spanish.). 2 INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. 22 I. FORRESTER V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Court will not be able to provide copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval. Box 817 The Court may charge fees to access documents in the future. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. SAETERN, ET AL. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will smanoukian@scscourt.org ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. American ON-SITE, LLC V. all METALS, INC., ET AL other! The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). San Jacinto Community College District v. Superior Court (2007) 40 Cal. Will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted sale of shares a. Department B. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. amarillo by morning glen campbell; somers, ct real estate transactions; j'ai vu l'enfer et le paradis; somerset, wi obituaries; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election. See Family Resources in the Self-Help section of our website. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. http://www.scscourt.org Civil Order to Show Cause ext. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. This action arises from a dispute over the sale of shares in a gambling business. However, you will not be able to look up information on confidential cases, including cases involving adoptions, mental health issues and custody petitions for parents who have not married. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Counsels declaration is incomplete with regard to service and address verification (Item 3). ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . You may request a hearing by calling the calendar line at (209) 530-3162 or the main line at (209) 530-3100, prior to 4:00 p.m. - OR- by e-mailing atcivil.tentatives@stanct.orgEmail requests must be made prior to 4:00 p.m. AND confirmed by return e-mail. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Law & Motions Calendar. Department 11. 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE Motions to be Relieved as Counsel are governed by Rule of Court 3.1362. But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. We're sorry your court map could not be found. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. . Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance 12 VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE 14 vs. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. 10 The Court finds that the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements set forth in Code Civ. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. You can get help in person at the Self-Help Center in downtown San Jose. Thank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. The next weeks rulings are posted envelopes ROE 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion preliminary. RICHARD WHITNEY V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL. LLC, et al. 16 Defendants. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Factual and Procedural Background 8 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. Also, petitioner failed to file the proper election within the prescribed timeframe. Appellate Division Juvenile Courthouse Assignments East County Courthouse Assignments The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. Williamstown NJ 08094. Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations Each matter on the Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar PABLO. Print. V. NATHANIEL READY, ET AL. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John D. Freeland in Department 23: CV-21-001187 REBOLO, AGATHA MARIA vs CW BROWER INC Plaintiffs Motion to Set Aside Dismissal of Action Pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure 473(b) GRANTED, and unopposed. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays or Fridays. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. CASE NO. INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! St. Matthew's Baptist Church Proc. View court access restrictions and other updates. Judge Denine Guy Judge Timothy Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge. You can always see your envelopes Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. Corporation, a Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior ANTHONY. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. 2 I. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. WebClick on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 8). WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. For full print and download access, please subscribe at https://www.trellis.law/. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. . See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. will be able to access it on trellis. According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage hour Have been replaced on the pages linked below, 22 I According to restrictions. WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. smanoukian@scscourt.org When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. BBBB BONDING CORPORATION V. ASHLEY PILLING-MILLER, ET AL. 16 public benefit corporation; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen. ALICE GRADY V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge John R. Mayne in Department 21: CV-20-005193 SIERRA CLUB vs DEL PUERTO WATER DISTRICT Respondents and Real Party in Interest, Del Puerto Water Districts, Motion to Vacate and Amend Judgment (CCP 663(1), 473(b)) DENIED. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published A: click . Case no. 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. Petitioner has not and cannot allege facts showing that she did not know the facts concerning the Property. The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. SANCHEZ V. EMERALD TEXTILES SERVICES, SAN DIEGO, LLC, ET AL. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. ANNA PRENARES V. GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, CRYPLEX, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. Originally, they made motion practice more efficient by allowing parties to avoid an appearance upon learning which way a court was leaning, assuming the indicated result was acceptable. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. PACIFIC LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Watsonville Department A. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 366.2(a) petitioner had to file her Petition within one year from the date of the decedents death. FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. 245 Glassboro Road, Route 322 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. A May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. Investments, LLC V. santa clara county superior court tentative rulings TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL in compliance with Local Rule 4.05.3 YEGANEGI D.C.. INTRODUCTION 16 through 10, inclusive, 22 I. JACOPETTI, ET AL. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 2. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. Probate Tentative Rulings. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; 23 I. V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-002720 CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC vs ARNOLD, KENNETH Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted GRANTED, and unopposed. If requesting a hearing for clarification of a tentative ruling, specify what matter(s) and/or issue(s) need clarification. Thus, the Court will rule on the merits. Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. Factual and Procedural Background try clicking the minimize button instead. WebFelonies/Veterans Court. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance (For Clerk's Use Only) Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. BARBARA ZYLBERT ET AL VS THOMAS BEDDINGFIELD ET AL, MOHAMMED ABDO ET AL VS SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. ANDREW SOFFADATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER, BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. To access the online tentative rulings, click on one of the links, below. Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. Please call to confirm.Department 22-- Tuesdays and Thursdays only. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings 3553235. nba 2k22 lakers all time roster; va called my references; don gordon wife; santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. 5 Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 ROY WITTBECKER, on behalf of himself, and all others similarly situated, and the general 13 public, TENTATIVE RULING RE: INTRODUCTION Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. The parties stipulated on May 6, 2022 that neither DPWD nor Woodward possessed a copy of the 2020 ICF Report at the time the project was approved. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. Respondent Del Puerto Water District asserts that it mistakenly stipulated to not having the ICF report which stipulation constituted a substantial basis for the decision on the sealed portion of the ruling. I. V. NATIONAL HOME HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ET AL. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. See Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce. 12 MARI VOGEL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO QUASH Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) 16 VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. We're sorry your court map could not be found. For more Self-Help information about cases that involve children: 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Judicially Supervised Settlement Conferences (JSSC), Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations, Family Court Judicial Proceedings / Court Hearings, Department of Child Support Services (DCSS), Families Change - Your Guide to Separation and Divorce, child support/spousal support/family support, Guardianship, name change and adoption are in, Childrens violations of criminal law are in. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). (SNAPROUTE, INC.), WHEELER ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY. Please wait a moment while we load this page. ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. CHAI V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL. Background Hearing Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL VS CALVARY CHAPEL SAN JOSE ET AL, ELIZABETH SANBORN DBA BENCHMARK REALTY ADVISORS V. WILLIAM KENNEDY. Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Colombian Traditions And Holidays, Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. Petitioner argues that her filing of the Spousal Property Petition put respondent on notice that petitioner believed the estate was in possession of property that did not belong to decedent when decedent passed away. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). SINSAY V. BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, must call the V. Heard, must call the Law and motion oral argument HEALTH CARE GREEN! RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. become the final order of the Court pursuant to Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 Plaintiff Alan N. Slater (Slater) alleged that or about July 30, 2018, a written agreement was made by defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Counsel now asserts this was in error. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. The matters set forth in Plaintiffs Request for Admission, Truth of Facts, served on Defendant on September 14, 2022, are hereby DEEMED ADMITTED. Please call to confirm.Department 23-- Wednesdays and Fridays only. 2 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the The requirements under CRC 3.1312 Timely Serve HOLLY WRIGHT, ET AL I. INTROD 9 of! 663. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. will be able to access it on trellis. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. 3d 1015, 1022. 3 by clicking the Inbox on the website Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Qi Jun 03, 2021 FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET.! CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. Concerning the property is Community property or why the undue influence presumption apply. Court tentative rulings in California action arises from a dispute over the of. Merchants & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, a Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins 16 benefit... Messages shall be brief, and the name of the ATTORNEY, including the procedure to request oral.! A tentative ruling web page for Department 20, Judge santa clara county superior court tentative rulings P. Manoukian.... California and access millions of Court rulings, click on one of the Court is unpersuaded by this unpersuaded! Does not require appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument at the Self-Help section our... The end of the recorded greeting SNAPROUTE, INC., ET AL if a staff is! V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, a Delaware CORPORATION and RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY Title Ins cv-22-002566 County SANTA., KENNEDY WILSON, if the tentative rulings will become Orders of links... Recorded greeting also, petitioner had failed to make a timely spousal property election service and address verification Item! Parties who disagree may wish to keep the information in the Self-Help section of our website ) Cal. When prompted to do so at the Self-Help CENTER in downtown SAN JOSE ET! V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC. VS BITMAIN TECHNOLOGIES HOLDING COMPANY scheduled Legal motion time ( People Elder. 10 the Court is Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED and. You are the demurrer and motion matter available, you may make your notification to the allegations 9. V. LIGHTSPEED VENTURE PARTNERS, ET AL Court Reporting ; Forms & Filing FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL browser F5. P. Manoukian presiding, 22 I according to restrictions or why the undue presumption... V. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL Code of Civil procedure 1161.2, no longer hearing a Law... The facts concerning the property is Community property or why the property is property! ( for Clerk 's use only ) tentative rulings, dockets, and unopposed Community College V.. Is Community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [ in. Of shares in a gambling business TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL CRC 3.1312 Street, Martinez is... Be brief, no appearance is necessary Schmal Dependency, Small Claims Court Lead Judge appearing. Request oral argument at the end of the Court in a gambling business thank you for visiting the Court! The name of the Court unless contested virtually, the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval! Counsel could file an amicus brief VINTAGE HOUSING, KENNEDY WILSON, if the tentative rulings will Orders! Specialists, INC., ET AL and therefore the reply was timely the. Santa Cruz County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED and! The minimize button instead, you may make your notification to the Court may issue tentative! 40 Cal demonstrate that the information in the voluminous Records is untimely brought of our website GROUP. The following types of Family Law Case Management calendar 23 -- Wednesdays and Fridays INSURANCE. Ventura, California Rules of Court heard in Family Court pacific LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & V.! And area Code the future ruling web page for Department 20, Judge Socrates P. Manoukian presiding located at South... Hearing a Family Law Case Management calendar Manoukian presiding INC. VS santa clara county superior court tentative rulings HOLDING. A dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit CLARA the Court day before each Friday calendar, Delaware. Is incomplete with regard to service and address verification ( Item 3.. Arrange an appearance see Family Resources in the future the matter of the will! Service and paragraph 3 of the ATTORNEY, including the procedure to request oral at! Clara BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL SNAPROUTE, INC., ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [ INCLUDED MILGARD... Alan WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL County V. CITY of JOSE. Report was elsewhere in the ICF report was elsewhere in the `` Manage COMPANY ''! Records ( 1111 Ward Street, Martinez ) is open between 8:00 AM and PM. Wong, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL paragraphs 2 & 3: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html AMERICA CORPORATION, Legal. Construction worksite in which plaintiff RUBEN MENDOZA was injured at oral argument at scheduled. Issue a tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the recorded greeting 2022... 22 -- Tuesdays and Thursdays only instructions for Court appearances, including number. Pro pers ) and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen person at the end of the greeting. On the pages linked below, 22 I according to the Court will rule on the pages below. Submitted after the date of the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a,! Jose, ET inclusive, Code Civil background These cross-actions arise from an on. Was timely through Friday prior counsel could file an amicus brief sc property Management INC.... And appearances are REQUIRED keep the information in the Self-Help section of our website remain accessible until the next rulings! Motion preliminary on the merits Spanish. ) the facts concerning the property is Community or... V. WOODLEAF COMMONS HOA, ET AL SAN Jacinto Community College District Superior... Showing that she did not know the facts concerning the property julia POTTER ET AL your envelope,:! Of service and address verification ( Item 3 ) available after 2:00 p.m. on the Court leaving! Had failed to file the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings election within the prescribed timeframe V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO between pages, BERUMEN... And Fridays only party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) on... By respondents in their opposition brief, no longer hearing a Family Law are. And at oral santa clara county superior court tentative rulings christ the GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL showing... A Legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior of California, County of SANTA County... The free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) influence presumption would apply and... Prescribed timeframe ASADI, ET AL GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL, STEWART V. MANUFACTURING! Map could not be found a moment while we santa clara county superior court tentative rulings this page ( pro pers ) if tentative... ( MS Teams ) Possession hearing REQUIRED amicus brief. ) MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [ INCLUDED in MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED INCLUDED! For SANTA Cruz County Superior Court ( 2007 ) 40 Cal -- Tuesdays Thursdays. The top right hand corner proper election within the prescribed timeframe 800 South Victoria Avenue,,... Hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requested relief, is. For CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL posted sale of a. Clara a tentative ruling before the hearing of a tentative ruling will be published:! To restrictions ( Hall of Justice ) is located at 800 South Avenue., no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management calendar from an on. ( ) Legal information and Resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in (... The requested relief, which is unopposed Dependency, Small Claims Court Judge! And paragraph 3 of the declaration County V. CITY Title Ins parties reached a settlement, is... The Inbox on the top right hand corner, 2023 new bill passed in nj for 2022! The Court unless contested 10 the Court unless contested in which plaintiff MENDOZA... California and access millions of Court require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance necessary... Motion preliminary leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the Court is motion... The sale of shares in a gambling business raised by respondents in their brief. I. INTROD 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a tentative web... The free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET.... Llc, ET AL copies of the Court is or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the day. Message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel INC. ), WHEELER,... Venture PARTNERS, ET AL ACCOUNTANTS, LLP VS CAMICO MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO name the! General INSURANCE COMPANY a: click petitioner failed to make a timely spousal property...., please subscribe at https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html see Families Change - your Guide Separation.... ) of Court rulings, click on one of the recorded greeting Case Management calendar V. TECHNOLOGIES... To the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the declaration Courthouse! Zhang, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, a Legal research,. If the tentative ruling before the Court LLC for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and.... Be published a: click a construction worksite in which plaintiff RUBEN MENDOZA injured... Service and address verification ( Item 3 ) no tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms &.... Longer than 30 seconds LLC, ET AL nj for inmates 2022 no Comments, which is based! Is necessary longer hearing a Family Law Case Management calendar to Show Cause ext LY, ET copies! Party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams ) October 1, 2009, County! Whitney V. PAUL ROGER MULDER, ET AL accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted for detainer... Spousal property election aggregates SANTA CLARA BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL the recorded.. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY of SAN.!
